Use of the canaima educational tool from the perspective pedagogical for primary education teachers
Keywords:
Canaima tool, pedagogical perspective, teacherAbstract
The purpose of this research is to: Interpret the meaning of the Canaima Educational Tool from the pedagogical perspective of Primary Education Teachers of the EB “Manuel Cedeño”, Peña Municipality, Yaracuy state, for which the following purposes were established: (a) Explore the reasons that lead to the use of the Canaima Educative tool from the pedagogical perspective of primary school teachers. (b) Describe the factors that influence the pedagogical use of the Canaima Educative tool by primary school teachers; and (c) Unveil the use of the Canaima Educative tool from the pedagogical perspective of Primary Education teachers. Likewise, this proposal was methodologically framed in the interpretive paradigm, with a qualitative approach, under the phenomenological method supported by hermeneutics, and the research line Information and Communication Technology. Contributing to generate new contributions by interpreting the pedagogical use of the Canaima Educative tool, under an innovative and constructivist conception that is in accordance with the new educational trends and environment in which the student operates
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional. (1999). Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Imprenta nacional. Caracas
Cáceres, J. (2003). Praxis docente en la educación venezolana. Edit. Unilyt. Valencia
Crespo Suárez, E. (2003). El construccionismo y la cognición social: metáforas de la mente. Política Y Sociedad, 40(1), 15 - 26.Disponible en: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/PO SO0303130015Apdf (Consulta, 2015: Agosto, 10)
Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Educación (MPPE- 2007). Diseño Curricular. Sistema Educativo Bolivariano Nacional
Martínez, M. (1992). La Crítica de la Razón Pura. Edit.Trillas. México
Monasterio, L. (2009). Capacitación docente y actitudes hacia el computador. Disponible en: www.Investigacion.ilce.edu.mx/panel_control/doc/c36,a ct,intro,d1.pdf . (Consulta, 2019: Noviembre, 25)
Taylor, S. y Bogdan, R. (1986). Introducción: ir hacia la gente”, en Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. México, Paidós
UNESCO (2009). La UNESCO y la educación. Disponible en: www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001849/184967s. pdf . (Consulta, 2019: Noviembre, 11)
Farías, J. (1999). Sociedad de la información y Educación (libro electrónico). Disponible en: www.ub.edu/prometheus21/articulos/obsciberprome/bla nquez.pdf (Consulta, 2019: marzo, 12)
Fernández, S. y Díaz, S. (2002). Unidad de investigación.Universidad de Coruña España
Husserl, E. (1969). La fenomenología crítica de la matematización y el sentido de la responsabilidad. Edit. Springer
Leal, J. (2005). Autonomía del sujeto investigador. Valencia. 1° edic.Edit. Océano azul
Leal, J. (2009). Autonomía del sujeto investigador. Valencia. 2° edic. Edit. Océano azul
Ley Orgánica de Educación y su Reglamento (LOE, 2009). Disponible en:www.oei.es/quipu/venezuela/Reglamento_ley_org_educ
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright from the year of publication
This work is licensed under a:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
The opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the publication's editor or UCLA. Total or partial reproduction of the texts published here is authorized, provided that the complete source and the electronic address of this journal are cited. Authors have the right to use their articles for any purpose, provided it is done on a non-profit basis. Authors may publish the final approved version of their work online or in any other medium after it has been published in this journal.
