Fermentative production of xylitol from agro-industrial biomass using novel indigenous bacterial isolates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro383.5Keywords:
Agro-industrial residues, Citrobacter sp., indigenous bacteria, sustainable bioeconomy, xylitolAbstract
This study focuses on the microbial production of xylitol, a low-calorie sugar alcohol widely used in food and pharmaceutical applications, using bacterial strains isolated from agricultural soils. Unlike conventional chemical methods that rely on high temperature, pressure, and costly catalysts, this work explores a more sustainable and economical alternative based on microbial fermentation of agricultural waste substrates. A total of twenty microbial isolates were obtained and screened for their ability to utilize xylose and produce xylitol, out of which four bacterial strains—Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas sp., Citrobacter sp., and Enterobacter sp.—were selected for further evaluation. Process optimization was carried out using Response surface methodology (RSM) with a central composite design to study the combined effects of pH, inoculum concentration, incubation time, D-xylose, and yeast extract. Among the tested strains, Citrobacter sp. showed the best performance, with a maximum xylitol concentration of 124.2 g/L observed at 102 hours. The model predicted optimal conditions at pH 7, 3% inoculum, and 120 hours of incubation. Overall, the findings suggest that Citrobacter sp. has good potential for converting low-cost agricultural residues into xylitol, supporting the development of more sustainable and economically viable bioprocesses.
Downloads
References
1. Adhikari, D.K., D. Dasgupta, S. Bandhu and D. Ghosh. 2017. Challenges and prospects of xylitol production with whole cell biocatalysis: A review. Microbiological Research 197: 9-21.
2. Becker, J. and C. Wittmann et al. 2011. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for high-level xylitol production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 92(1): 89-98.
3. de Siqueira Fraga, E.G., F.M.T. Campos, M.P. da Silva Cavalcante, L.F.B. Martins, E.M.R. Neto and M.J. Mimica. 2020. Xylitol: A promising ally for oral health. Journal of Young Pharmacists 12(3): 197-202.
4. Dhaver P., B. Pletschke, B. Sithole and R. Govinden. 2022. Isolation, screening, preliminary optimisation and characterisation of a xylanase-producing marine alga-epibiotic bacterium. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 36(1): 263-275.
5. Domingues, R., M. Bondar, I. Palolo, O. Queirós, C.D. de Almeida and M.T. Cesário. 2021. Xylose metabolism in bacteria-Opportunities and challenges towards efficient lignocellulosic biomass-based biorefineries. Applied Sciences 11(17): 8112.
6. Espinoza-Acosta, J.L. 2020. Biotechnological production of xylitol from agricultural waste. Biotecnia 22(1): 126-134.
7. Gasmi Benahmed, A., A. Gasmi, M. Arshad, M. Shanaida, R. Lysiuk, M. Peana and G. Bjørklund. 2020. Health benefits of xylitol. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104(17): 7225-7237.
8. Gómez-Millán, G., S. Hellsten, J. Llorca, R. Luque, H. Sixta and A.M. Balu. 2019. Recent advances in the catalytic production of platform chemicals from holocellulosic biomass. ChemCatChem 11(8): 2022-2042.
9. Hermida, C., Ó.H. Martínez-Costa, G. Corrales et al. 2020. Improvement and validation of D-xylose determination in urine and serum by a phloroglucinol-based assay. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 58(5): 1-8.
10. Hermida, C., Ó.H. Martínez-Costa, G. Corrales, C. Teruel, V. Sánchez, J.J. Sánchez et al. 2020. Improvement and validation of D-xylose determination in urine and serum by a phloroglucinol-based assay. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 58(5): 1-8.
11. Kaur, S., G. Payal and K. Y. Sudesh. 2023. Evaluation of fermentative xylitol production potential of yeasts under inhibitor stress. Fermentation 9(2): 181.
12. Kumar, K., E. Singh and S. Shrivastava. 2022. Microbial xylitol production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 106(3): 971–979.
13. Kusumawati, N., S.H. Sumarlan, E. Zubaidah and A.K. Wardani. 2023. Isolation of xylose-utilizing yeasts from oil-palm waste for xylitol and ethanol production. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 10: 71.
14. Lugani, Y. and B.S. Sooch. 2020. Fermentative production of xylitol from a newly isolated xylose reductase-producing Pseudomonas putida BSX-46. LWT 134: 109988.
15. Lugani, Y., M. Puri and B.S. Sooch. 2021. Recent insights, applications, and prospects of xylose reductase: A futuristic enzyme for xylitol production. European Food Research and Technology 247(4): 921-946.
16. Ranieri, R., F. Candeliere, J. Moreno-García, J.C. Mauricio, M. Rossi, S. Raimondi and A. Amaretti. 2024. Fermentative processes for the upcycling of xylose to xylitol by immobilized cells of Pichia fermentans WC1507. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 12: 1339093.
17. Ravindran, R., S. Kavitha, R. Yukesh Kannah, O.P. Karthikeyan, G. Kumar, V. Kumar Tyagi, J. Rajesh Banu and A.K. Jaiswal. 2022. Production of xylitol from lignocellulosic biomass: Recent advances and future perspectives. Bioresource Technology 344: 126245.
18. Saravanan, P., S. Ramesh, N. Jaya and S.A. Jabasingh. 2023. Prospective evaluation of xylitol production using Debaryomyces hansenii var. hansenii, Pachysolen tannophilus, and Candida guilliermondii with sustainable agricultural residues. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 13(4): 2813-2831.
19. Singh, S., S.K. Arya and M. Krishania. 2024. Bioprocess optimization for enhanced xylitol synthesis by a new isolate Meyerozyma caribbica CP02 using rice straw. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts 17: 31.
20. Wal, P., R.S. Pal and A.A. Wal. 2019. Review on the sugar alternates. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 10(4): 1595-1604.
21. Zahoor, F., C. Sooklim, P. Songdech, O. Duangpakdee and N. Soontorngun. 2021. Selection of potential yeast probiotics and a cell factory for xylitol or acid production from honeybee samples. Metabolites 11(5): 312.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 C. Ajitha, S. Anandan, N. Vanitha, S. Padmavathy, S. Karthik Sundaram

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The opinions expressed by the authors not necesarily reflect the position of the publisher or UCLA. The total or partial reproduction of the texts published in this journal is authorized, as long as the complete source and the electronic address of this journal is cited. Authors can publish the final version of their work on internet or any other medium, after it has been published in this journal.
Bioagro reserves the right to make textual modifications and technical adjustments to the figures of the manuscripts, in accordance with the style and specifications of the journal.
