Dimensional characterization of seeds of two white maize single hybrids from Venezuela

Authors

  • Manuel Ávila Fundación Danac. San Javier, Yaracuy, Venezuela. http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9180-8774
  • Yorman Jayaro Fundación Danac. San Javier, Yaracuy, Venezuela. http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9641-6583
  • Naya Quintana Fundación Danac. San Javier, Yaracuy, Venezuela. http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9872-4526
  • Humberto Moratinos Instituto de Agronomía, Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay. Venezuela. http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5799-8886

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro383.9

Keywords:

Seed length, seed thickness, seed width

Abstract

During the conditioning of maize seeds, the sorting process enables the production of a commercial product that complies with legal size regulations and is sufficiently homogeneous for use in mechanized sowing equipment. Knowledge of the length, width, and thickness dimensions of the seeds to be processed is essential for sorting optimization. To characterize the dimensional variation of white maize hybrids Danac-493 and Danac-829, samples were classified using a combination of 10 sieves of various shapes and sizes, and the weight percentage of the resulting fractions was determined. In each fraction, the length, width, and thickness of 30 randomly selected seeds were measured. Both hybrids exhibited a higher weight proportion of round seeds, which were primarily retained in sieves 20 to 22; fine-type seeds were mainly retained in sieves 20 to 24. For both hybrids, seed length and width showed significant differences among the sieves used, for both coarse and fine types; thickness did not show significant differences in Danac-829. These results provide a reference framework for improving the uniformity of maize seed as a commercial product through the optimization of the classification process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. CONASEM (Comisión Nacional de Semillas). 2016. Normas Específicas de Certificación de Semilla de Híbridos y Variedades de Maíz (Zea mays L.). Maracay, Venezuela. 17 pp.

2. Doerge T., M. Jeschke y P. Carter. 2020. Planting outcome effects on corn yield. Crop Insights. Pioneer Agronomy Sciences 1 (25): 1-7.

3. El-Abady, M.I. 2015. Influencia del tamaño y la forma de la semilla de maíz, sembrada a diferentes profundidades y temperaturas, en la emergencia y el vigor de las plántulas. Research Journal of Seed Science 8: 1-11.

4. FEDEAGRO (Confederación de Asociaciones de Productores Agropecuarios). 2025. Excelente clima, buenas cosechas y resultados precarios para los agricultores en el 2024. 3p. https://n9.cl/zlsxd

5. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2014. El maíz blanco: Un grano alimentario tradicional en los países en desarrollo. Roma, Italia. 22 pp. http://www.fao.org /3/a-w2698s.pdf.

6. Kara B. 2011. Effect of seed size and shape on grain yield and some ear characteristics of maize. Research on Crops 12: 680-685.

7. Mattana, R., R. Del Castagner, E. Garetto, y A. Bonacci. 2016. Desempeño de distintos dosificadores de semilla de maíz (Zea mays L.) a distintas velocidades de siembra. Semiárida 26(2): 27-37.

8. Miranda F., M. Cerovich, J. Díaz, y R. Figueroa. 2011. Bases para una nueva clasificación dimensional de la semilla Certificada de maíz para la siembra de precisión en Venezuela. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía 35(3): 112-118.

9. SNICS (Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural-Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas). 2024. Guía para la descripción de variedades nativas de maíz (Zea mays L.). Tlalnepantla, Estado de México. 33 p. https://n9.cl/49wcj

10. Tabakovic, M., M. Simic, R. Stanisavljevic, M. Milivojevic, M. Secanski y D. Postic. 2020. Effects of shape and size of hybrid maize seed on germination and vigour of different genotypes. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 80(3): 381-392.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Nota Técnica

How to Cite

Dimensional characterization of seeds of two white maize single hybrids from Venezuela. (2026). Bioagro, 38(3), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro383.9