Continuous Adaptation: The DNA of Ambidextrous Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14556177Keywords:
Continuous adaptation, Ambidextrous organizations, Organizational DNA, Innovation strategies, Change management, LeadershipAbstract
The purpose of this essay is to explore the importance of continuous adaptation as a key element of the "DNA" of ambidextrous organizations, that is, those that balance the exploitation of their existing capabilities with the exploration of new opportunities. The main results and conclusions highlight that continuous adaptation enables ambidextrous organizations to remain relevant and competitive in volatile and changing business environments. This involves fostering a culture of experimentation and learning, promoting collaboration and open communication, and investing in technology and agile processes. Additionally, the crucial role of leadership in developing this adaptive capacity as a fundamental part of organizational DNA is emphasized. Finally, the connection between continuous adaptation and business sustainability is established, as the former fosters resilience, innovation, and social responsibility, key elements for ensuring the long-term viability of organizations in an increasingly complex environment.
Downloads
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley. Reading, Massachusetts, EE. UU. Disponible en: https://archive.org/details/organizationalle00chri (Consultado: 15, 5, 2024).
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 27-30. . Disponible: https://hbr.org/ (Consultado: 01,5, 2024).
Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47-55. Disponible: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/ (Consultado: 06,4, 2024).
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. Nueva York, EE. UU
Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2014). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. Stamford, Connecticut, EE. UU.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. Nueva York, EE UU.
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2000). The character of a corporation: How your company's culture can make or break your business. HarperBusiness. Nueva York, EE. UU.
Gómez, J. (2019). Adaptación continua y toma de decisiones: Estrategias empresariales en entornos cambiantes (p. 67). Editorial Empresarial. Madrid, España.
Gómez, L. (2018). Liderazgo en tiempos de cambio: Estrategias para la adaptabilidad organizacional. Editorial Liderazgo. Bogotá, Colombia.
Hamel, G., & Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52-63. Disponible: https://hbr.org/ (Consultado: 02,2, 2024).
He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. Disponible: https://pubsonline.informs.org/ (Consultado: 05,11, 2023).
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. Disponible: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ (Consultado: 16,12, 2023).
Hillson, D. (2002). Effective risk management: Some keys to success (pp. 33-34). Project Management Institute. Nueva York, EE. UU.
Jones, G. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change (6th ed.). Pearson Education. Londres, Reino Unido.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2017). Essentials of Contemporary Management (7.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Nueva York, EE. UU
Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press,. Boston, EE. UU.
López, M. (2017). Adaptación continua y sostenibilidad empresarial: Claves para el éxito en el siglo XXI. Editorial Empresa.
Martínez, R. (2019). Innovación y eficiencia: La adaptación continua como motor de sostenibilidad. Editorial Innovación. Barcelona, España.
Martínez, R. (2020). Cultura de aprendizaje y experimentación: La clave para la adaptabilidad organizacional. Editorial Innovación. C de México, México.
Meyer, A. D., & Heppard, K. A. (2000). Detecting environmental changes: Managing uncertainty (pp. 45-46). Oxford University Press. Oxford, Reino Unido
Molina, R. (2018). Adaptación continua en la estrategia organizacional (p. 45). Editorial Estrategia. Caracas, Venezuela.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation (pp. 67-69). Oxford University Press. Oxford, Reino Unido
O'Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change (p. 89). Harvard Business Review Press. Boston, EE. UU.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. Disponible: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-organizational-behavior (Consultado: 08,7, 2023).
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. Disponible en: https://journals.aom.org (Consultado: 11, 7, 2024).
Pérez, A. (2020). Innovación y adaptación en la estrategia organizacional (p. 89). Editorial Innovación Empresarial. Valencia, Venezuela
Pérez, S. (2019). Colaboración y confianza: La base para una organización adaptable. Editorial Equipo. Lima, Perú.
Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 236-249. Disponible: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/industrial-marketing-management (Consultado: 09,7, 2024).
Robertson, D. (2020). Digital transformation and organizational flexibility Routledge. . Londres, Reino Unido.
Smith, J. (2019). Navigating digital disruption in business.: Business Press. Nueva York, EE. UU.
Sutherland, J. (2014). Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time. Crown Business. Nueva York, EE. UU.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148 (Consultado: 11, 12, 2023).
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. Disponible: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ (Consultado: 28,10, 2024).
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2307/41165746 (Consultado: 05,8, 2023).
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, EE. UU.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. Disponible: https://pubsonline.informs.org/ (Consultado: 25, 5, 2024).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos del/de autor/es a partir del año de publicación
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación ni de la UCLA. Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de los textos aquí publicados, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente completa y la dirección electrónica de esta revista. Los autores(as) tienen el derecho de utilizar sus artículos para cualquier propósito siempre y cuando se realice sin fines de lucro. Los autores(as) pueden publicar en internet o cualquier otro medio la versión final aprobada de su trabajo, luego que esta ha sido publicada en esta revista.
