Gerenciando teorias institucionais no equilíbrio de pressões internas: conformidade, eficiência e inovação em organizações por meio de uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17978553Palavras-chave:
Isomorfismo, legitimidade, práticas organizacionais, pressões institucionais, teorias institucionaisResumo
O objetivo deste estudo consistiu em analisar sistematicamente, por meio de uma revisão da literatura contemporânea, como as teorias institucionais explicam o equilíbrio nas pressões externas das organizações que competem pela conformidade com as demandas internas de eficiência e inovação. As teorias institucionais têm fornecido uma estrutura sólida para compreender como as organizações são influenciadas pelo seu ambiente, em particular pelas normas sociais, expectativas culturais e pressões regulatórias. Para esta revisão, foi realizada uma busca bibliográfica utilizando gestores de bases de dados eletrônicas: Web of Science, Scopus, JSTOR e Google Scholar, que determinou nove (9) artigos com pertinência temporal entre 2020 e 2024. Considerando o critério de busca, foram usadas palavras-chave: (I) teoria institucional, (II) legitimidade organizacional, (III) isomorfismo. Como resultados, este artigo resume que as organizações gerenciam as pressões institucionais, equilibrando a necessidade de conformidade, eficiência interna e inovação com base na teoria institucional; determinam-se os mecanismos pelos quais as pressões institucionais influenciam o comportamento organizacional, incluindo as forças coercitivas, miméticas e normativas. Onde existem estratégias como o desacoplamento, acoplamento seletivo e o empreendedorismo institucional, que as organizações usam para equilibrar as demandas externas com as prioridades internas. A revisão conclui que uma abordagem holística, que combina essas perspectivas, é essencial para compreender como as organizações conseguem reconhecimento e garantem sua eficácia em meio às complexidades institucionais em mudança.
Downloads
Referências
Adams, C. (2016). Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures) . The British Accounting Review, 48(3), pp. 283–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.05.002.Disponible:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890838916300154. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Al-Dosari, M., Marques, A., & Fairbrass, J. (2023). The effect of the EU’s directive on non-financial disclosures of the oil and gas industry. Accounting Forum, 47(2), pp. 166–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2023.2198179. Disponible:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01559982.2023.2198179. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Baldini, M., Dal Maso, L., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F; & Terzani, S (2018). Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), pp. 79–98. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1. Disponible: https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v150y2018i1d10.1007_s10551-016-3139-1.html. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Bansal, P., & Song, H.C. (2017). Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11, pp.105-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095. Disponible:https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3634417 [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025].
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), pp. 65–107. doi:10.1080/19416520903053598. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50372096_How_Actors_Change_Institutions_Towards_a_Theory_of_Institutional_Entrepreneurship. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025].
Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: a content analysis in family and non-family firms . Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), pp. 511-534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z. Disponible: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Comyns, B. (2018). Climate change reporting and multinational companies: Insights from institutional theory and international business. Accounting Forum, 42(1), pp. 65-77. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318907209_Climate_change_reporting_and_multinational_companies_Insights_from_institutional_theory_and_international_business. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Chaudhry, N., & Amir, M. (2020). "From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pp. 3542-3554. December. Disponible: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v29y2020i8p3542-3554.html. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Chatelain-Ponroy, S., & Morin-Delerm, S. (2016). Adoption of sustainable development reporting by universities: an analysis of French first-time reporters. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), pp. 887–918. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1720 Disponible:: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/aaajpp/v29y2016i5p887-918.html. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Dacin, T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, E. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special Research Forum. Academy of Management Journals, 45(1), pp. 45-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.6283388. Disponible: :https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274913361_Institutional_Theory_and_Institutional_Change_Introduction_to_the_Special_Research_Forum. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Derchi, G., Dávila, A., & Oyon, D. (2023). Green incentives for environmental goals. Management Accounting Research, 59(4), pp. 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2022.100830. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367369898_Green_incentives_for_environmental_goals. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional Isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101. Disponible: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2494584 . [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Drori, G., Höllerer, M., & Walgenbach, P. (2014). Unpacking the Glocalization of Organization: From Term, to Theory, to Analysis. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), pp. 85–99. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.904205. Disponible: https://www.academia.edu/8551856/2014_Drori_Gili_S_Markus_A_H%C3%B6llerer_and_Peter_Walgenbach_Unpacking_the_Glocalization_of_Organization_From_Term_to_Theory_to_Analysis_European_Journal_of_Cultural_and_Political_Sociology_1_1_85_99. . [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Felin, T., Foss, N., & Ployhart, R.(2015). The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), pp. 575-632. DOI:. doi:10.1080/19416520.2015.1007651. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276094840_The_Microfoundations_Movement_in_Strategy_and_Organization_Theory. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Friedland ., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. (W. P. DiMaggio, Ed.) Chicago: Chicago University Press. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238198697_Bringing_Society_Back_In_Symbols_Practices_and_Institutional_Contradictions. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S (2013). Institutional Entrepreneurship. (E. Carayannis, Ed.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 1069–1074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_421. Disponible: :https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_421. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025].
Glynn, M., & Watkiss, L. (2020). Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half-Century of Weick’s Theorizing. Special Issue:Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of Karl E. Weick's The Social Psychology of Organizing, 57(7), pp. 1331-1354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12613. Disponible: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joms.12613. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Glynn, M., & D’Aunno, T. (2023). An intellectual history of institutional theory: looking back to move forward. . Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), pp.301-330. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0341. Disponible: https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/an-intellectual-history-of-institutional-theory-looking-back-to-m. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Granqvist, N., & Gustafsson, R. (2015). Temporal Institutional Work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0416. Consultado: Disponible: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amj.2013.0416. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Lounsbury, M., & Micelotta, E. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), pp. 317–371. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590299. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232976474_Institutional_Complexity_and_Organizational_Responses. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025].
Greenwood, R; Oliver, C.,Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. (2017). Introduction: into the fourth decade. En C. O. R. Greenwood (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2nd edition ed., pp. 1-24). Disponible: : https://research.wu.ac.at/ws/files/19853367/Meyer_etal_2017_SAGE_Introduction-Into-the-fourth-decade.pdf. [Consultado: 19 de marzo, 2025]
Hampel, C.E; Lawrence, T.B., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: taking stock and making it matter. (C. O. R. Greenwood, Ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage. Disponible: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d7ee9459-667d-4d4e-993d-44630da74a23. [Consultado: 19 de marzo, 2025]
Haveman, H., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), pp. 1606–1651. doi:10.1086/231128. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240567527_Structuring_a_Theory_of_Moral_Sentiments_Institutional_and_Organizational_Coevolution_in_the_Early_Thrift_Industry. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Hirsch, P; & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), pp. 406–418. doi:10.1177/0002764297040004004. Disponible: https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/ending-the-family-quarrel-toward-a-reconciliation-of-old-and-new-. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025.]
Hoffman, A., & Jennings, D. (2015). Institutional Theory and the Natural Environment: Research in (and on) the Anthropocene. Organization & Environment, 28(1), pp. 8-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266155753. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1086026615575331. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), pp. 398–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393791. Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393791. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Hoque, Z., & Kaufman, M. (2024). Incarnation and decay: reconciling the organizational decision-making and organizational institutional theory perspectives on budgetary research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(9), pp. 1-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-07-2023-6554. Disponible: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/aaaj-07-2023-6554/full/html. [Consultado: 22 marzo, 2025]
Huang, Y., & Huang C. (2022). Exploring institutional pressure, the top management team’s response, green innovation adoption, and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan’s electrical and electronics industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), pp. 800-824. doi:10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0126. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363415892_Exploring_institutional_pressure_the_top_management_team's_response_green_innovation_adoption_and_firm_performance_evidence_from_Taiwan's_electrical_and_electronics_industry. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Kauppi, K. (2022). Chapter 21: Institutional theory. En L. E. Wendy Tate (Ed.). Business 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00025. Disponible:https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781839104503/book-part-9781839104503-25.xml.[Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Ke, D., & Wareewanich, T. (2024). Institutional pressure and corporate green innovation—the influence of knowledge management process. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), pp. 1240–1257. doi:https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2234. Disponible: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2234. [Consultado: 23 marzo, 202]
Kılıç, M., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Abdullah, S. K. (2020). Does institutional theory explain integrated reporting adoption of Fortune 500 companies? November 2020. Journal of Applied Accounting Research ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), 22(1), pp. 114-137. doi:10.1108/JAAR-04-2020-0068. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345805372_Does_institutional_theory_explain_integrated_reporting_adoption_of_Fortune_500_companies. [Consultado: 23 marzo, 2025]
Lalit, M., & Nikunj, K. (2024). Role of Institutional Pressure and Organization Climate in Adoption of Process Innovation for Improving Environmental Performance – A Research on Indian Mining Industry. International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, (pp. 82-91). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50204-0_8. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377049864_Role_of_Institutional_Pressure_and_Organization_Climate_in_Adoption_of_Process_Innovation_for_Improving_Environmental_Performance__A_Research_on_Indian_Mining_Industry. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. En C. H. S.R. Clegg (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 215–254). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Disponible: https://thomaslawrence.wordpress.com/wp content/uploads/2008/08/lawrence-and-suddaby-2006-institutions-and-institutional-work.pdf. [Consultado: 19 de marzo, 2025]
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work. In:eds. Institutional Work. En R. S. T. Lawrence (Ed.), Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.001. Disponible: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/institutional-work/introduction-theorizing-and-studying-institutional work/04EA6EA71EA9DC499E2BE73DDAA1E820. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Lawrence, T., Leca, B., & Zilber, T.B. (2013). Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), pp. 1023–1033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495305. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840613495305. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Lee, D., Fu, Y.,Zhou, D.,Nie, T.,& Song, Z.(2022). Is There a Missing Link? Exploring the Effects of Institutional Pressures on Environmental Performance in the Chinese Construction Industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), pp. 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811787. Disponible: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11787. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Liao, Z (2018). Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm’s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and The Environment, 27(7), pp. 849–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2036. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323147593_Institutional_pressure_knowledge_acquisition_and_a_firm's_environmental_innovation. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Liberati, A.,Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C.,Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J.,& Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol., 62, pp. 1-34. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. Disponible: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19621070/. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Liu, N., Hu, H., & Wang, Z. (2022). The Relationship between Institutional Pressure, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Entrepreneurial Performance—The Moderating Effect of Network Centrality. Sustainability, 14(19), pp. 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912055. Disponible: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12055. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Lopatta, Kerstin., Tideman, S. A; Scheil, C., & Makarem, N. (2023). The current state of corporate human rights disclosure of the global top 500 business enterprises: measurement and determinants. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 96(102512), pp. 1-23. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102512. Disponible:https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v96y2023ics1045235422000971.html. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalisation of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp. 255-266. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3069295. Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3069295. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Lounsbury, M. (2003). The problem of order revisited: towards a more critical institutional perspective. . (R. W. Clegg, Ed.) London: Blackwell. Disponible : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277587352_The_Problem_of_Order_Revisited_Towards_a_more_Critical_Institutional_Perspective. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), pp. 289–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634436. Disponible: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amj.2007.24634436. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), pp. 349–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.001. Disponible:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361368207000414. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025].
Lounsbury, M., Steele, M., Shaoqing, M; & Toubiana, M. (2021). New directions in the study of institutional logics: from tools to phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, pp. 261–280. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734. Disponible: https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/new-directions-in-the-study-of-institutional-logics-from-tools-to. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Ma, Y., Wang, J., & Lv, X. (2022). Institutional pressures and firms’ environmental management behavior: the moderating role of slack resources. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, pp. 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2079077. Disponible: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2022.2079077. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Meyer, J; & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp. 440–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/226550. Disponible: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/226550. [Consultado:19 marzo, 2025]
Mizruchi, M., & Fein, L. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), pp. 653–683. doi:10.2307/2667051. Disponible: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Social-Construction-of-Organizational-A-Study-Mizruchi Fein/80b348aee93a1082e65559db8074e5740be61957. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Modell, S. (2022). Is institutional research on management accounting degenerating or progressing? A Lakatosian analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), pp. 2560–2595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12792. Disponible: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1911-3846.12792. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Munir, K. (2014). A Loss of Power in Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614545302. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1056492614545302. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 223-238. Disponible: https://eclass.aegean.gr/modules/document/file.php/TNEY202/digitalinnovationmisq%20copy.pdf. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Ocasio W., Thornton, P; & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Advances to the institutional logics perspective. En C. O. R. Greenwood (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 509–531). Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446280669.n20. Disponible: https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/advances-to-the-institutional-logics-perspective. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), pp. 145-179. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/258610. Consultado: Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/258610. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of de-institutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), pp. 563–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300403. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/017084069201300403. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025].
Parsa, S., Dai, N., & Belal, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences. Accounting and Business Research, 51(1), pp. 36–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1780110. Disponible: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/161858/. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Perkmann M., Phillips, N., & Greenwood, R. (2022). Institutional arbitrage: how actors exploit institutional difference. Organization Theory, 3(2), pp. 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221090313. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/26317877221090313. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Powell, W., & Colyvas, J. (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. (C. O. Greenwood, Ed.) doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n11. Disponible: https://sk.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/hdbk_orginstitution/chpt/microfoundations-institutional-theory. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Reay, T., & Hinings, C.R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), pp. 629–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840609104803. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Robson, k., & Ezzamel, M. (2023). The cultural fields of accounting practices: institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 104(101379), pp. 1-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101379. Disponible: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361368222000460. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Roespinoedji, D., Kurniawan, R., Nugraha, U., & Jabarullah, N.H (2019). The Role of Institutional Pressures in Driving Internal and External Green Supply Chain Practices and Environmental Performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(1), pp. 287–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v8i1.2894. Disponible: https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/2894. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Salim K., Amir, A., Maelah, R., & Jalaludin, D. (2023). Effects of institutional pressures, organisational resources, and capabilities on environmental management accounting for sustainability competitive advantage. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(3), pp. 1284–1313. doi:https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.6421.2023. Disponible: https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/IJBS/article/view/6421. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Scott, W. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. (T. O. Sage, Ed.) M@n@gement 2014, 17(2). Disponible: https://shs.cairn.info/revue-management-2014-2-page-136?lang=en. [Consultado: 20 marzo, 2025]
Sedgwick, D., & Lemaire, R. (2023). Acquiesce, Compromise, or Avoid? Collaboration, Coordination, & Cooperation as Different Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(1), pp. 57-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231186426. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02750740231186426. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Seo, M., & Creed, W.E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp. 222-247. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353. Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4134353. [Consultado: 19 marzo, 2025]
Shu, Y., Zhuang, X., Ying, R., & Xu, G. (2024). Formal Institutional Pressure and the Integration of Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavily Polluting Industries in China. Sustainability, 16(6), pp. 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062471. Disponible: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2471. [Consultado: 24 marzo, 2025]
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in higher education publishing 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), pp. 801–843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/210361. Disponible: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/210361. [Consultado: 22 marzo, 2025]
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2013). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press(ISBN: 9780191767036), pp. 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001. Disponible: https://academic.oup.com/book/35363. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Tolbert, P.S., & Zucker, L.G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. (C. H. I.S.R. Clegg, Ed.) Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 175-190. Disponible: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/5132446.pdf. [Consultado: 21 marzo, 2025]
Weber, K., & Dacin, M. (2011). The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue Organization Science. Organization Science, 22(2), pp. 287-298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0632. Disponible: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.1100.0632. [Consultado: 22 marzo, 2025]
Williams, T., Gruber, D., Sutcliffe, K., Shepherd D., & Zhao, E. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), pp. 1-37. doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134.Disponible:https://www2.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85043976145&doi=10.5465%2fannals.2015.0134&partnerID=40&md5=d9dc467e019ba582e7591e8b936e444d. [Consultado: 22 marzo, 2025]
Zhou, M., Xianyi Long, X., & Govindan, k. (2024). Unveiling the value of institutional pressure in socially sustainable supply chain management: The role of top management support for social initiatives and organisational culture. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), pp. 2629-2648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2710. Disponible: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.2710. [Consultado: 22 marzo, 2025]
Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. (2010). Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), pp. 189-221. doi:https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.1. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189?icid=int.sj-abstract.citing-articles. [Consultado: 23 marzo, 2025]
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Este trabalho está licensiado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos del/de autor/es a partir del año de publicación
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación ni de la UCLA. Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de los textos aquí publicados, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente completa y la dirección electrónica de esta revista. Los autores(as) tienen el derecho de utilizar sus artículos para cualquier propósito siempre y cuando se realice sin fines de lucro. Los autores(as) pueden publicar en internet o cualquier otro medio la versión final aprobada de su trabajo, luego que esta ha sido publicada en esta revista.
