Semantic-discursive study of responsibility in Paul Ricoeur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10426402%20Keywords:
Discourse analysis, relation of meaning, shared knowledge, responsibility, RicoeurAbstract
Human interaction revolves around discursive practices, whose semanticity is essential for the formation of culture. Through Discourse Analysis, it is possible to categorize, analyze, deconstruct and reconstruct discourses, whose relation with meaning and social bond is undeniable. This semantic-discursive study will review the category responsibility in the text Power, fragility and responsibility, a product of Paul Ricoeur's speech within the framework of his investiture as an honorary doctor by the Complutense University of Madrid in 1993. Two intentions are proposed: from the lexical-semantic point of view, to establish the meaning relation of the responsibility category, through the application of Van Dijk's macro-rules (cited by Calsamiglia and Tusón, 2001) to determine the global semantic macrostructure, the lexical and grammatical procedures that ensure the maintenance of the category and the metaphor analysis model proposed by Lakoff and Johnson (1995) as input to build concepts in the speech. From the discursive point of view, review the management of shared knowledge strategies (Van Dijk, 2013), which Ricoeur uses in front of the epistemic community of the Complutense University of Madrid, in order to guarantee communication, through presupposition and implicatures, which guide the understanding of the construction of knowledge of the extralinguistic world. It is concluded that the value of interdisciplinarity in language studies is due to the fact of articulating the structure of metaphor to the approach of shared sociocultural knowledge and ideology, which use discursive strategies to manifest them. Also, the lexical, semantic and discursive procedures used allowed us to specify the new definition of responsibility proposed by Ricouer, which enriches his ethical philosophy.
Downloads
References
Calsamiglia, H., Tusón, A. (2001). Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Ariel: Barcelona.
Charaudeau, P. (2009). Análisis del discurso e interdisciplinariedad en las ciencias humanas y sociales. in Puig L. (ed.), El discurso y sus espejos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
Greimas, A. (1987). Semántica estructural. Investigación metodológica. Editorial Gredos, S.A.: Madrid.
Hjelmslev, L. (1971). Prolegómenos a una teoría del lenguaje. Editorial Gredos, S.A.: Madrid.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1995). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Cátedra: Madrid.
Lyons, J. (1997). Semántica lingüística. Una introducción. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A.: Barcelona.
Morales, E. (2000). Semántica en Manual de ciencias del lenguaje. Universidad de la Coruña.
Ricoeur. P. (1993). Poder, fragilidad y responsabilidad. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/295/
_Poder%20fragilidad%20y%20responsabilidad.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Ricœur, P. (2002). Del texto a la acción. Ensayos de hermenéutica II. Fondo de Cultura Económica: México. D.F.
Ullmann, S. (1976). Semántica. Una introducción a la ciencia del significado. Editorial Aguilar: Madrid.
Van Dijk, T. (1994). Conferencia 3 Estructura discursiva y cognición social en Discurso, poder y
cognición social. Cuadernos. Nº2, Año 2. Octubre de 1994. Maestría en Lingüística.
Escuela de Ciencia del Lenguaje y Literaturas.
Van Dijk, T. (2002). Tipos de conocimiento en el procesamiento del discurso en Lingüística e
interdisciplinaridad: Desafíos del nuevo milenio. Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso
de la Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 2002, pp.41-66. http://www.discursos.org/oldarticles/Tipos%20de%
conocimiento%20en%20el%20procesamiento%20del%20discurso.pdf
Van Dijk, T. (2013). Discurso y contexto. Un enfoque sociocognitivo. Editorial Gedisa, S.A.: Barcelona.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright from the year of publication
This work is licensed under a:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
The opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the publication's editor or UCLA. Total or partial reproduction of the texts published here is authorized, provided that the complete source and the electronic address of this journal are cited. Authors have the right to use their articles for any purpose, provided it is done on a non-profit basis. Authors may publish the final approved version of their work online or in any other medium after it has been published in this journal.
