Teacher as an agent of change in the rural community

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21398964

Keywords:

teacher, agent of change, rural community

Abstract

This scientific article reflects on the role of the teacher as an agent of social change in the rural community of Guanarito, Siquisique Parish, Urdaneta Municipality, Lara State, Venezuela. The main purpose was to reveal, interpret, and understand the experiences and subjective meanings that teachers assign to educational work, understood as a formative process that serves as a strategic pillar of community development. Methodologically, the study was framed within the interpretive paradigm, using a qualitative approach. A phenomenological-hermeneutic method was applied to understand the reality under study. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of three teachers, in order to gain insight into their experiences and perspectives. The findings showed that teaching goes beyond academic instruction and includes the promotion of local culture, the technical management of community projects, and mediation in neighborhood conflict resolution. Social actors view teachers as natural leaders and key drivers of sustainable community development. In conclusion, the role of teachers in Guanarito goes beyond education; they also co-construct social reality, acting as a dialogic bridge between tradition and modernity, and playing a significant role in strengthening community resilience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Norvit Yoseliz Suárez Mora, Instituto Pedagógico de Barquisimeto Estado Lara, Venezuela

Doctoral Candidate in Education
Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador
Instituto Pedagógico de Barquisimeto Estado Lara - Venezuela
Subdirección de Investigación y Postgrado
Interinstitutional Doctoral Program in Education (PIDE)
Agreement UPEL – UCLA – UNEXPO
Venezuela
E-mail: suareznorvit@gmail.com

References

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

Buber, M. (1947). Yo y Tú. Ediciones Siruela.

Chayanov, A. (1925). The Theory of Peasant Economy. University of Wisconsin Press. Madison, WI.

Denzin, N. y Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching. En Wittrock, M.C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 119-161). Macmillan. New York.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI Editores. Buenos Aires.

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.

Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition. Bergin & Garvey Publishers. South Hadley, MA.

Havelock, R. (1973). The Change Agent's Guide to Innovation in Education. Educational Technology Publications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster. New York.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. Albany, NY.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Suárez Mora, N. Y. (2026). Teacher as an agent of change in the rural community. Teorías, Enfoques Y Aplicaciones En Las Ciencias Sociales, 18(38), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21398964