How do open data enhances public accountability?
An analysis of the Metropolitan District of Quito open government portal (2014-2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7855443Keywords:
Open Data, Municipal Government, Government ControlAbstract
Open government data portals have been embraced for their ability to improve transparency and strengthen democratic control. However, previous studies suggest that this relationship is complex and is conditioned by the portal's design itself and its proper use by interested users. This article analyzes the relationship between open data and democratic control through an analysis of the design and uses of the open government portal of the Metropolitan District of Quito. The structure, organization and presentation of the information is assessed and its online uses are tracked. Evidence indicates that, although some good practices are applied, there are many shortcomings in the portal design and very limited use of the data offered to assess government management.
Downloads
References
Alloa, E. (2018). Transparency: A Magic Concept of Modernity. En E. Alloa y D. Thomä (Eds.), Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives (pp. 21-55). Palgrave Macmillan.
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., y Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399-418.
Banco Mundial. (2016). “Open Government Impact and Outcomes: Mapping the Landscape of Ongoing Research”. Informe del World Bank Open Government Global Solutions Group. http://opengovimpact.org/img/og-impact-full-report.pdf
Bannister, F., y Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 119-128.
Birchall, C. (2018). Interrupting Transparency. En En E. Alloa y D. Thomä (Eds.), Transparency, Society and Subjectivity: Critical Perspectives (pp. 343-368). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13 (4), 447-468.
Canares, M., y Shekhar, S. (2015). “Open Data and Sub-National Governments: Lessons from Developing Countries”. Documento de trabajo de la World Wide Web Foundation. En: https://webfoundation.org/docs/2015/08/ODDC-Phase-2-Paper-Subnational.pdf
Carlitz, R. (2013). Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(S1), 49-67.
Carothers, T. y Brechenmacher, S. (2014). “Accountability, Transparency, Participation, and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus”. Documento de trabajo del Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. En: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/new_development_consensus.pdf
Carta Internacional de Datos Abiertos. (2019). Versión español. En: https://opendatacharter.net/principles/
Chatwin, M., Arku, G., y Cleave, E. (2019). Defining subnational open government: Does local context influence policy and practice? Policy Sciences, 52, 451-479.
Chatwin, M., y Francoli, M. (2022). How ‘Local’ are Action Plans submitted by Open Government Partnership Local Participants? People Place and Policy Online, 15(3), 149-168.
Fontaine, G., y Gurza, A. (2019). Controles democráticos y cambio institucional en América Latina: Presentación del dossier. Íconos, 23(65), 7-28.
Fox, J. (2007). The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability. Development in Practice, 14(4-5), 663-671.
Fraundorfer, M. (2016). The Open Government Partnership: Mere Smokescreen or New Paradigm? Globalizations, 14(4), 611-626.
Fung, A., Graham, M., y Weil, D. (2007). Full Disclosure: The Politics, Perils and Promise of Targeted Transparency. Cambridge University Press.
Fung, A., y Weil, D. (2010). Open Government and Open Society. En D. Lathrop y L. Ruma (Eds.), Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice (pp. 105-114). O’Reilly.
GODI (Global Open Data Index). (2019). “Tracking the state of government open data”. En: http://2015.index.okfn.org/
Gray, J. (2015). “Open Budget Data: Mapping the Landscape”. Reporte de investigación de Open Knowledge, Digital Methods Initiative y Global Iniciative for Financial Transparency. En: http://www.fiscaltransparency.net/resourcesfiles/files/20150902128.pdf
Hernández-Bonivento, J., Gandur, M.P. y Najles, J. (2014). Gobierno Municipal Abierto en América Latina: de la Proximidad Administrativa a la Acción Colaborativa. OEA.
Hernández-Luis, A. (2018). La democracia está en los detalles: Aproximaciones y actualización del debate sobre la rendición de cuentas. Kairós, 1(1), 40-53.
Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in Historical Perspective. En C. Hood y D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? (pp. 3-24). Oxford University Press.
Hood, C (2010). Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple. West European Politics, 33(5), 989-1009.
Hood, C., y Margetts, H. (2007). The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.
ILDA (Iniciativa Latinoamericana para los Datos Abiertos) (2022). “Barómetro Global de Datos: Primera Edición”. Informe institucional. En: https://globaldatabarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/GDB-Report-Spanish.pdf
Isunza-Vera, E. (2021). “De ‘la accountability’ y la rendición de cuentas al ‘control democrático de lo público’ en América Latina”. Documento del Accountability Research Center. https://accountabilityresearch.org/de-la-accountability-y-la-rendicion-de-cuentas-al-control-democratico-de-lo-publico-en-america-latina/
Isunza, E. y Gurza, A. (2013). Develando cauces recurrentes: Los controles democráticos no electorales como prácticas de resignificación en la construcción democrática. En E. Isunza (Coord.), Controles democráticos no electorales y régimen de rendición de cuentas. En búsqueda de respuestas comparativas: México, Colombia, Brasil, China y Sudáfrica (pp. 10-62). CIESAS.
Lee, S.Y., Díaz-Puente, J., y Martin, S. (2017). The Contribution of Open Government to Prosperity of Society. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 144-157.
Lourenço, R.P. (2013). Open Government Portals Assessment: A Transparency for Accountability Perspective. EGOV International Conference on Electronic Government, 2013, 62-74.
Lourenço, R.P (2016). Evidence of an Open Government Data Portal Impact on the Public Sphere”. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(3).
Lourenço, R.P (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 1-10.
Lourenço, R.P., Piotrowski, S., e Ingrams, A. (2017). Open data driven public accountability. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1).
Lourenço, R.P., Piotrowski, S., e Ingrams, A. (2015). ICT Support: A Detailed Account of Public Accountability Process and Tasks. EGOV International Conference on Electronic Government, 2015, 105-117.
Lourenço, R.P., y Serra, L. (2014). An Online Transparency for Accountability Maturity Model. EGOV International Conference on Electronic Government, 2014, 35-46.
Muente-Kunigami, A., y Serale, F. (2018). Los datos abiertos en América Latina y el Caribe. BID.
MDMQ (2022). “Segundo Plan de Acción de Gobierno Abierto del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito 2022-2023”. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/SEGUNDO-PLAN-DE-ACCIO%CC%81N-DE-GOBIERNO-ABIERTO-DMQ-LVSEP2022-1.pdf
MDMQ (Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito). (2015). “Plan Metropolitano de Desarrollo y Ordenamiento Territorial. Volumen II. Propuesta: Componente Estratégico”. En: https://www.patronato.quito.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PMDOT-Plan-Metropolitano-de-Desarrollo-y-Ordenamiento-Territorial-2015-2025-Vigente.pdf
ODB (Open Data Barometer) (2019). “The Open Data Barometer”. En: https://opendatabarometer.org/?_year=2017&indicator=ODB
OGP (Open Government Partnership) (2023). “Sobre OGP Local”. En: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/ogp-local/about-ogp-local-program/
Open Data Inception (2019). “Open Data Inception - 2600+ Open Data Portals Around the World”. En: https://opendatainception.io/
Ordenanza Metropolitana 101 que regula la gestión de la información en el Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, sancionada el 16 de febrero de 2016.
Ordenanza Metropolitana 102 sustitutiva a la Ordenanza Metropolitana No. 187, sancionada el 6 de julio de 2006, que promueve y regula el Sistema Metropolitano de Participación Ciudadana y Control Social, sancionada el 03 de marzo de 2016.
Ordenanza Metropolitana 184 de Gobierno en el Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, sancionada el 29 de septiembre de 2017.
Peixoto, T. (2013). The Uncertain Relationship Between Open Data and Accountability: A Response to Yu and Robinson’s The New Ambiguity of ‘Open Government’. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 60, 200-213.
Peruzzotti, E., y Smulovitz, C. (2002). Accountability social: la otra cara del control. En E. Peruzzotti (Ed.), Controlando la política. Ciudadanos y medios en las nuevas democracias latinoamericanas (pp. 23-52). Temas.
Pirannejad, A., e Ingrams, A. (2022). Open Government Maturity Models: A Global Comparison. Social Science Computer Review, en línea.
Pozo, C. (2017). Gobierno abierto y laboratorios de innovación pública: el caso del municipio de Quito. En A. Naser, Á. Ramírez-Alujas y D. Rosales (Eds.), Desde el gobierno abierto al Estado abierto en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 403-422). CEPAL.
Ramírez-Alujas, Á. (2012). Gobierno abierto es la respuesta: ¿cuál era la pregunta?”. Más Poder Local, 12,14-22.
Ramírez-Alujas, Á., y Dassen, N. (2016). Vientos de cambio II: Avances y desafíos de las políticas de gobierno abierto en América Latina y el Caribe. BID.
Resolución A-017 del alcalde del Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, emitida el 12 de diciembre de 2014.
RList (2019). “Countries Open Data Portal: Full Dataset View”. En: https://rlist.io/dataset/rlistinsights/19575564/countries-op
Robinson, M. y Heller, N. (2015). “Subnational Governments and the Open Government Partnership: Issues and Options Paper”. Documento de trabajo de OGP. En: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/documents/subnational-governments-and-open-government-partnership
Romero, J., de la Mora, D., y Ruiz, L. (2016). “Digital Budgets: How are Governments Disclosing Fiscal Information Online?”. Documento de trabajo de IBP. En: https://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/ibp-paper-digital-budgets-how-governments-disclose-fiscal-info-online-2016.pdf
Secretaría General de Planificación (2019). “Presupuesto abierto”. En: https://gobiernoabierto.quito.gob.ec/presupuesto-abierto/
Tsai, L., Morse, B., Toral, G., y Lipovsek, V. (2019). Preface to Evidence Syntheses of Whitin-Government and Citizen-Government Accountability Pathways. Documento resumen. https://www.transparency-initiative.org/reports/5826/preface-evidence-syntheses-accountability-pathways/
Yu, H., y Robinson, D. (2012). The New Ambiguity of ‘Open Government’. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 59, 178-208.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Rodrigues de Caires
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors keep their copyrights so articles can be reused for teacher and research purpose. Readers and users can also reuse articles for the same purposes but not for commercial purposes. Ágora de Heterodoxias has no responsibility on information given by collaborators which is not necessarily the point of view of the publication
