Decent Work and Its Circumstances: Reflections on SDG 8 in the Context of Digital Capitalism.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18760249Keywords:
Decent work, Digital capitalism, Sustainable Development Goal 8 (SDG 8)Abstract
This study assesses the viability of the "decent work" concept (SDG 8), concluding that a fundamental contradiction exists between its normative ideal and the metabolic trajectory of the capitalist system in the digital age. Employing a threefold methodology that combines bibliographic-documentary analysis, the theoretical frameworks of Ortega y Gasset, Bourdieu, and Mészáros, and Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis (using Antconc 4.3.1 software), this paper argues that the limited outcomes of the Decent Work Agenda are not simply implementation failures, but rather symptoms of capital's systemic logic, which structurally shifts risks onto the workforce. The analysis examines the contemporary labor paradox, wherein perceived autonomy in the platform economy masks profound precarity and self-exploitation. It further demonstrates that regulatory frameworks developed in the 20th century are structurally inadequate to address this new reality. Therefore, the study contends that the universalization of decent work is unviable under the current logic of capital, necessitating a fundamental redefinition of social justice principles for the digital era.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1043–1171). Elsevier.
Antunes, R. (2024). Uberización del trabajo y capitalismo de plataforma: ¿una nueva era de desantropomorfización del trabajo? En D. Castillo (Coord.), Capitalismo digital después de la pandemia: Nuevo paradigma del trabajo global (pp. 173–198). Siglo XXI Editores.
Anker, R., Chernyshev, I., Egger, P., Mehran, F., & Ritter, J. A. (2003). La medición del trabajo decente con indicadores estadísticos. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 122(1–2), 161–195.
Baker, P. (2005). Public discourse of gay men. Bloomsbury Academic.
Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Bloomsbury Academic
.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Las estructuras sociales de la economía. Anagrama.
Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. Sage.
Castillo, D. (Coord.). (2024). Capitalismo digital después de la pandemia: Nuevo paradigma del trabajo global. Siglo XXI Editores.
De la Cruz, F. (21 de abril 2021). El nuevo Consenso de Washington. Agenda Pública. https://agendapublica.es/noticia/17333/nuevo-consenso-washington.
Diez Prat, F. (2023). Mi empresa es mi cuerpo: El caso de los repartidores en la economía de plataformas [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid].
Dosi, G., Grazzi, M., Moschella, D., & Tamagni, F. (2019). The capital–labour split: A new deal for the 21st century? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 72(4), 793–810.
Egbert, J. & Baker, P. (Ed.). (2020). Using corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis. Routledge.
Ekbia, H. R., Nardi, B., & Sabanovic, S. (2015). On the margins of the machine: Heteromation and robotics. iConference 2015 Proceedings.
Ekbia, H. R., & Nardi, B. A. (2017). Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. MIT Press.
Erickson, C. L., & Mitchell, D. J. B. (2007). El monopsonismo, metáfora del nuevo mercado de trabajo postsindical. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 126(3–4), 189–213.
Ferraro, T., Pais, L., & Dos Santos, N. R. (2018). El Cuestionario del Trabajo Decente (CTD): Un instrumento para la medición del trabajo. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 137(2), 265-290.
Grenville, S. (24 de octubre de 2023). How should Australia react to Bidenomics? The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/how-should-australia-react-bidenomics.
Godfrey, M. (2003). Employment dimension of decent work: Trade-offs and complementarities (Discussion Paper DP/148/2003). Instituto Internacional de Estudios Laborales.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2003). Global Employment Trends, January 2003. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2004). Global Employment Trends, January 2004. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2006). Global Employment Trends Brief, January 2006. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2011). Global Employment Trends 2011. The Challenge of Job Recovery. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2012). Global Employment Trends 2012. Preventing a deeper jobs crisis. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2013). Global Employment Trends 2013. Recovering from a second jobs dip. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2014). Global Employment Trends 2014. Risk of a jobless recovery?. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2015). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2015. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2016). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2016. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2017). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2017. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2019a). The Future of Work Initiative: Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2019b). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2019. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2020). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2020. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2021). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2021. ILO.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2022). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2022. ILO.
I International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2023). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2023. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/SNCP1637
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2024). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2024. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/HQAE1085
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2025). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2025. ILO. https://doi.org/10.54394/IZLN1673.
International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2003). World Economic Outlook, September 2003: Public debt in emerging markets. IMF.
International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2004). Fostering structural change through labor market reform. In: World Economic Outlook, April 2004. IMF. Pp. 103-142.
International Monetary Fund [IMF]. Fiscal Affairs Department. (2010). From Stimulus to Consolidation: Revenue and Expenditure Policies in Advanced and Emerging Economies. IMF.
International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2016). Time for a supply-side boost? Macroeconomic effects of labor and product market reforms in advanced economies. In World Economic Outlook, April 2016. International Monetary Fund.
Kucera, D. (2008). Informal economy, poverty and labor market segmentation. ILO.
Maupain, F. (2009). New foundation or new façade? The ILO and the 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. European Journal of International Law, 20(3), 823–852. DOI:10.1093/ejil/chp070.
Maupain, F. (2013a). The future of the International Labour Organization in the global economy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Maupain, F. (2013b). The ILO regular supervisory system: A model in crisis? International Organizations Law Review, 10(1), 117–165.
Maupain, F. (2015). Revisiting the future. International Labour Review, 154(1).
Maupain, F. (2020). A second century for what? The ILO at a regulatory crossroad. International Organizations Law Review, 17(1), 291–343
.
Mészáros, I. (2001). Más allá del capital: Hacia una teoría de la transición. Vadell.
Miguez, P. F. (2024). Plataformas, rentas y trabajo: Efectos en la competencia capitalista contemporánea. Realidad Económica. 54(364), 11-40. https://ojs.iade.org.ar/index.php/re/article/view/295/251.
Organización Internacional del Trabajo [OIT]. (2024). El trabajo decente en la economía de plataformas digitales (Informe IV, 113. ª Reunión de la Conferencia Internacional del Trabajo).
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1914). Meditaciones del Quijote. Revista de Occidente.
Pfeiffer, S. (2024). ¿La digitalización como gran transformación? Fuerzas distributivas en el capitalismo digital. En D. Castillo (Coord.), Capitalismo digital después de la pandemia: Nuevo paradigma del trabajo global (pp. 173–198). Siglo XXI Editores.
Piore, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2008). Gestión de la flexibilidad e inspección del trabajo en el mundo latino. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 127(1), 1–23.
Prodnik, J. A. (2022). La lógica algorítmica del capitalismo digital. Hipertextos, 10.
Ramos, J., Sehnbruch, K., & Weller, J. (2015). Inclusive growth and decent work: The structural drivers of labor market outcomes in Latin America. ILO.
Sisto, V. (2022). Del trabajador al empresario de sí mismo: Subjetividad y trabajo en la era neoliberal. Editorial Universitaria.
Somavía, J. (2014). El trabajo decente: Una lucha por la dignidad humana. OIT.
Sotelo, A. (2024). Cuarta revolución industrial y plataformas digitales en el capitalismo pospandémico. En D. Castillo (Coord.), Capitalismo digital después de la pandemia: Nuevo paradigma del trabajo global (pp. 138–172). Siglo XXI Editores.
Tratado de Paz de Versalles. (1919). DiPublico.org. https://www.dipublico.org/1729/tratado-de-paz-de-versalles-1919-en-espanol/
Webster, E., Bamu, P., Das, D., Juggernath, S., Mosoetsa, S., Rajah, Z., & Ratele, K. (2015). Elaboración de una herramienta de diagnóstico para la consecución del trabajo decente. Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 134(1), 135–156.
Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Polity Press.
World Bank. (1990). World development report 1990: Poverty. Oxford University Press. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/6db831cb-da31-5fa6-a754-0dc7182ef75b.
World Bank. (1995). World development report 1995: Workers in an integrating world. Oxford University Press. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/365821468168543533/world-development-report-1995-workers-in-an-integrating-world.
World Bank. (2002). World development report 2002: Building institutions for markets. Oxford University Press. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/cde48204-41c4-5370-958a-1c27c817f375.
World Bank. (2013). World development report 2013: Jobs. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/c7bc435a-d635-5136-aacf-7cf0f5f3c6cf.
World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4402527f-e267-5a7c-baea-773390dabb8f.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright © 2026 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors keep their copyrights so articles can be reused for teacher and research purpose. Readers and users can also reuse articles for the same purposes but not for commercial purposes. Ágora de Heterodoxias has no responsibility on information given by collaborators which is not necessarily the point of view of the publication
