Morphologic and histological characterization of root apex of avocado rootstocks and its resistance to soil adverse factors
Abstract
The root apex is essential in the relationships that it has with the soil conditions. Therefore, a root morphological and anatomical study was carried out in avocado clonal genotypes for groping, and to determinate characteristics that could correspond to adaptation to biotic or abiotic adverse soil factors. Clonal 90 day-old plants were used, in a randomized design with tree replicates, where 32 characteristics of root apex, tissue, cap and cells were measured. From 12 selected variables, a grouping analysis was carried out that generated a hierarchical dendrogram and suggested the formation of four groups, that were corroborated by a canonical discriminative analysis. The cap area, distance between root apex and vascular cylinder and cortex width showed influence on grouping. The Group 1 was characterized by a medium thin apex, but with close angle, Group 2 had thick apex with close angle, Group 3 thin and slightly flat apex, and Group 4 thick rounded apex. There were no clear genotypes grouping according to their adaptation to adverse soil conditions, based on the characteristics supposed to be associated to root protection.
Downloads
References
2. Barrientos-Priego, A., R. Muñoz-Pérez, M. Borys y Ma. Martínez-Damián. 2006. Taxonomía, cultivares y portainjertos. In: D. Téliz y A. Mora (eds.). El Aguacate y su Manejo Integrado. Mundi-Prensa. México D.F. pp. 30-62.
3. Ben-Ya’acov, A. y E. Michelson. 1995. Avocado rootstocks. Horticultural Reviews 17: 381-429.
4. Campos Rojas, E. y P. Bautista. 2001. Propagación clonal de aguacatero Persea americana Mill. Memoria del 1er Congreso Mexicano y Latinoamericano del Aguacate. Facultad de Agrobiología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás Hidalgo. Uruapan, México. pp. 58-66.
5. Capon, B. 1990. Botany for Gardeners an Introduction and Guide. Timber Press. Oregon, USA.220 p.
6. Coffey, D.M. 1987. Phytophthora root rot of avocado an integrated approach to control in California. California Avocado Society Yearbook 71: 121-132.
7. Ellstrand, C., J. Lee, B. Bergh, M. Coffey y G. Zentmyer. 1986. Isozymes confirm hybrid parentage for ‘G 755’ selections. California Avocado Society Yearbook 70: 199-203.
8. Esau, K. 1985. Anatomía Vegetal. Editorial Omega. Barcelona, España. 729 p.
9. Frolich, E. y R. Platt. 1971. Use of the etiolation technique in rooting avocado cuttings. California Avocado Society Yearbook 55: 97-109.
10. Gallo, L. y F. Siverio. 1995. Evaluation of West Indian avocado seedlings’s tolerance-resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands compared with clonal resistant rootstocks Duke 7, Thomas and Toro Canyon, under field conditions. Proceedings of the World Avocado Congress III. ARO The Volcani Center. Tel Aviv, Israel. pp. 396-399.
11. González-Calderón, V., A. Barrientos-Priego, C. Núñez-Colín, S. Ramírez-Ramírez, R. Hofshi y M.L Arpaia. 2011. Anatomía de la lámina de hoja en ocho cultivares de aguacate. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 2(5): 733-744.
12. Johnson, D.E. 1998. Métodos Multivariados aplicados al Análisis de Datos. International Thomson Editores. México, D.F. 566 p.
13. M’Billaut, G. 1978. Brown root rot of avocados. Histological examination of root penetration and infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands. Fruits 33(2): 107-115.
14. Moore, R. y J. Pasieniuk. 1984. Graviresponsiveness and cap dimensions of primary and secondary roots of Ricinus communis Palmacristi (Euphorbiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 1767-1769.
15. Neilsen, M.J. 2016. Evaluation of Phytophthora root rot resistance in avocado. Tesis, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation. The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia. 176 p.
16. Phillips, D., R. Grant y G. Weste. 1987. Histological changes in the roots of an avocado cultivar, Duke 7, infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 77: 691-698.
17. Sass, J.E. 1968. Botanical Microtechnique. The Iowa State University Press. Ames, USA. 227 p.
18. SIAP (Servicio de Información Agro-alimentaria y Pesquera). 2017. Avance de siembras y cosechas por cultivo. México,DF. http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx:8080/agricola_siap_gobmx/ (consulta del 2/10/2017)
19. Smith, L., E. Dann, K. Pegg, A. Whiley, F. Giblin, V. Doogan y R. Kopittke. 2011. Field assessment of avocado rootstock selections for resistance to Phytophthora root rot. Australasian Plant Pathology 40(1): 39-47.
20. Wilcox, C., S. Dove, W. Doss y D. Greer. 2002. UTHSCSA Image Tool: IT version 3.0. Department of Dental Diagnostic Science, Health Science Center, University of Texas. San Antonio, TX, USA. 57 p.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Rights of the author/s are from the year of publication
This work is under the license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
The opinions expressed by the authors not necesarily reflect the position of the publisher or UCLA. The total or partial reproduction of the texts published in this journal is authorized, as long as the complete source and the electronic address of this journal is cited. Authors have the right to use their articles for any purpose as long as it is done for non-profit purposes. Authors can publish the final version of their work on internet or any other medium, after it has been published in this journal.
Bioagro reserves the right to make textual modifications and technical adjustments to the figures of the manuscripts, in accordance with the style and specifications of the journal.