Clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with inflamatory bowel disease using aminosalicilates, systemic corticoesteroids and immunomodulators

Authors

  • María García Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado
  • Emma Armanie Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado

Keywords:

intestinal diseases, colitis, ulcerative, Crohn disease, endoscopy, digestive system, anti-inflammatory agents

Abstract

A cross-sectional transversal research was conducted with the aim of determining clinical and endoscopic remission of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with the use of aminosalicylates, systemic corticosteroids and immunomodulators in patients attended at the Servicio de Gastroenterologia of the Hospital Central Universitario Dr. Antonio María Pineda, Barquisimeto, Lara state, during the period 2012-2020, using the Montreal, Mayo, CDEIS, Harvey-Bradshaw and Harvey-Bradshaw indices. The population consisted of 87 records from the clinical histories of patients who met the established criteria. The prevalence age was between 41 and 62 years; 65.5% were females. 44.9% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) showed left colitis and 34.6% pancolitis. In Crohn’s disease (CD), 88.9% of patients showed an inflammatory pattern. Clinical activity of UC at diagnosis was mild (47.7%) and moderate (44.9%). After induction, 87% of patients who did not achieve clinical remission were found to have mild activity. In CD at diagnosis, mild clinical activity prevailed (77.8%). Endoscopic activity at UC diagnosis was moderate (56.4%) and severe (32.1%) and at control colonoscopy during maintenance therapy, the percentage of patients in mild/ moderate activity was 40% in both groups. In UC, prednisone (47.4%) or mesalazine (24.3%) was used for induction and for maintenance, azathioprine + mesalazine or sulfasalazine (35.9% and 25.6%), respectively. In CD, prednisone (88.9%) was used for induction and for maintenance, aminosalicylates (77.8%) and aminosalicylates + azathioprine (22.2). In UC, 70.5% presented clinical remission and 29.5% endoscopic remission. In CD, 88.9% showed clinical remission and 33.3% endoscopic remission.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Walfish, A. y Ching, R. (2019). Generalidades sobre la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. MANUAL MERCK. Disponible en https://www.merckmanuals.com/es-pr/professional/trastornos-gastrointestinales/enfermedad-inflamatoria-intestinal-ibd/generalidades-sobre-la-enfermedad-inflamatoria-intestinal

Suárez L, Agrimbau J, Fuentes D. Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: Situación actual de las alternativas terapéuticas. Colomb Med 2007; 38(1): 34-40.

Paredes J, Otoya G, Mestanza A, Lazo L, Acuña K, Arenas J. Características epidemiológicas y clínicas de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en un hospital de referencia de Lima-Perú. Rev Gastroenterol 2016; 36(3): 209-18.

Mayorca A, Rodríguez V. (2018). Respuesta al tratamiento en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y su calidad de vida en la ciudad de Quito Cuenca y Guayaquil en el periodo enero – abril 2018. Tesis. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Quito. Ecuador.

Miranda L, Giraldo A. (2019). Caracterización epidemiológica y clínica de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en una cohorte de pacientes en el hospital militar central entre el año 2012-2017. [Tesis]. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. Bogotá. Colombia. Disponible en https://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10654/35073/tesis%20luis%20francisco%20mrianda%20.pdf?sequence=1

Mohammed N, Samaan M, Mosli M, Parker C, MacDonald S, Zou R. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1(1):CD011450.

Ikeya K, Hanai H, Sugimoto K, Osawa S, Kawasaki S, Takayuki T. The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity More Accurately Reflects Clinical Outcomes and Long-term Prognosis than the Mayo Endoscopic Score. J Crohns Colitis 2016; 10(3): 286-95.

Sambuelli A, Negreira S, Gil A, Goncalves S, Chavero P, Tirado P, et al. Manejo de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Revisión y algoritmos de tratamiento. ACTA – SUPLEMENTO EII. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2019; 48(4): 263-270.

Molodecky N, Kaplan G. Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 6(5): 339-46.

Paredes J, Otoya G, Mestanza A, Lazo L, Acuña K, Arenas J, et al. Características epidemiológicas y clínicas de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en un hospital de referencia de Lima-Perú. Rev Gastroenterol 2016; 36(3): 209-18.

Palmezano J, Figueroa C, Amaya R, Delgadillo D, Campo K, Gómez J. Descripción clínica y epidemiológica de los pacientes con colitis ulcerativa en un hospital universitario de Colombia. Med 2018; 40(1): 132-133.

Greuter T, Manser C, Pittet V, Vavricka S, Biedermann L. Gender Differences in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pub Med Digestion 2020; 101(1): 98-104.

Rojas C, Sánchez-Londoño S, Rojas N, Sepúlveda M, García J, Jiménez D, et al. Descripción clínico-epidemiológica de pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en una clínica de cuarto nivel en Cali. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol 2020; 35(2): 166-173.

Ko C, Singh S, Feuerstein J, Falk-Ytter C, Falk-Ytter Y, Cross R. AGA clinical guidelines on the management of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol 2019; 156(3): 748-764.

Peppercorn MA, Kane SV. (2018). Clinical manifestations, diagnosis and prognosis of Crohn disease in adults. Disponible en: https://www-uptodate-com.bibliotecavirtual.udla.edu.ec/contents/clinical-manifestations-diagnosis-and-prognosis-of-crohn-disease-in-adults?search=crohn%20disease&source=search_re [Consulta 2021, Mayo, 25]

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

García, M., & Armanie, E. (2023). Clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with inflamatory bowel disease using aminosalicilates, systemic corticoesteroids and immunomodulators. Boletin Médico De Postgrado, 39(1), 22-32. Retrieved from https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/bmp/article/view/4262

Issue

Section

Artículos originales