La filosofía de la matemática y sus objetos matemáticos

Autores/as

  • Andrés Alexander Sánchez Rosal Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. IPRGR

Palabras clave:

objetos matemáticos, platonismo, estructuralismo, intuicionismo

Resumen

El presente artículo se propone exponer los diferentes puntos  de vistas sobre la naturaleza de los objetos matemáticos como entidades en lo ontológico y como teorías desarrolladas en la filosofía de la matemática desde el punto de vista del platonismo surgida en su idea fuente y en contraparte  del anti-platonismo como teoría alterna que la refuta. Se aborda la confrontación ontológica de la matemática enfocada entre el platonismo y el estructuralismo, las dos corrientes principales de la filosofía de la matemática que se debaten sobre la presencia y la naturaleza de los objetos matemáticos.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Andrés Alexander Sánchez Rosal, Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. IPRGR

Andrés Alexander Sánchez Rosal

Experto en Procesos E-learning

Universidad  Virtual FATLA

Quito. Ecuador

Magíster en Informática Educativa

Universidad Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín

Maracaibo. Edo. Zulia

Venezuela

Doctor en Educación

Universidad  Pedagógica Experimental Libertador IPRGR

Rubio. Edo Táchira

Email: andressanchezrosal@gmail.com  

Citas

Avigad, J. (2007). Philosophy of Mathematic. En Boundas, C. (Ed.) The Edinburgh Companion to 20th Centuries Philosophies. Disponible: http://eddiejackson.net/web_documents/Philosophy%20of%20Mathematics.pdf

Balaguer, M. (2009). Realism y Anti-realism in Mathematics. En Gabbay, M., Thagard, P. and Woods, J. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Mathematic. Disponible: https://www.calstatela.edu/sites/default/files/groups/Department%20of%20Philosophy/realism_and_anti-realism_in_mathematics.pdf

Beziau, J. (2000). Logical Autobiography 50. University of Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Disponible: http://www.jyb-logic.org/papers/lauto50.pdf

Bremer, M. (2010). Contradiction in Mathematics. En Benedikt, T. (Ed), philosophy of Mathematics: Sociological aspects and Mathematical practice. College Publications. Disponible: http://www.lib.uni-bonn.de/PhiMSAMP/Data/Book/PhiMSAMP-bk_Bremer.pdf

Bueno, O. (2013). Putam and Indispensability of Mathematics. University of Miami. Disponible: https://miami.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/putnam-and-the-indispensability-of-mathematics

Bueno, O. (2016). An Anti-realist account of the application of mathematics. Philos Stud. Springer. Disponible: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0389/2a6301367e717c6d23ccc61730d4968f600a.pdf

Burgess, J. (2010). Parsons and the Structuralist view. Princetone University. Disponible:https://www.princeton.edu/~jburgess/ParsonsStructuralism.pdf

Callard, B. (2007). The Conceivability of Platonism. Philosophy Mathematic Vol. 15. No.3. Oxford University Press. Disponible: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b745/5e6a56652b90d6dae53cffbabdb0551dd9ec.pdf

Capozzi, M. y Roncaglia, G. (2009). History and Philosophy of Logic from Humanis to Kant. En Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. Disponible: https://philpapers.org/rec/CAPLAP

Colyvan, M., (2006). Applying Inconsistent Mathematics, University of Sidney. Australia. Disponible: http://www.colyvan.com/papers/aim.pdf
Corfield, D. (1997). Assaying Lakato´s philosophy of mathematics. Disponible:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039368196000027

Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. Harper & Row Publishers. New York. Disponible: https://academiaanalitica.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/michael-dummett-frege-philosophy-of-language.pdf

Ernest, P. (2007). The Philosophy of Mathematics, Values and Keralese Mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. Vol. 4 No. 2. UK. Disponible: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=tme

Field, H. (1980). Science without numbers. A defense of Nominalism. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey. Disponible: http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Field%20-%20SWN%20selections.pdf

Field, H. (1992). A nominalistic proof of the conservativeness of Set Theory. Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30226470?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Font, V., Godino, J. y Gallardo, J. (2012). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational studies in Mathematics. Disponible: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/159a/d667dd2f3f20331d9b42a4e25f78424e39fc.pdf

Friedman, M. (2006). Carnap and Quine : Twentieth Century echoes of Kant and Hume. En Analytic Kantianism . Philosophic Topic. Vol. 34 Nro. 1 y 2. Disponible: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43155410?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Gray, J. (2007). Worlds out of Nothing. Springer Verlag. London.

Gullberg, E. (2011). Objects and Objectivity Alternatives to Mathematical Realism. Umea University. Sweden. Disponible: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:415209/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Heller, M. (2006). Discovery the World Structure as goal of Physics. Pontificial Academic of Sciences. Acta 18. Vatican City. Disponible: http://www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/acta18/acta18-heller.pdf

Hodesdon, K. (2013). Mathematical Representation: playing a role. Conference on the Philosophy of logic and Mathematic at Cambridge University. Disponible: https://philarchive.org/archive/HODMRP-3

Irvine, A. (1996). Philosophy of Logic. En Shanker, S. (Ed.) Philosophy of Science, Logic and Mathematics in the Twentieth Century. Routledge. New York.

Koss, M. (2013). Semantic and Mathematic Foundations for Intuitionism . Indiana University. Disponible: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/17935/Koss_indiana_0093A_12346.pdf;sequence=1

Lower, B. Muller, T y Wilhelmus, M (2010). Mathematical Knowledge: a case study in empirical philosophy of mathematic. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48319172_Mathematical_knowledge_as_a_case_study_in_empirical_philosophy_of_mathematics

MacFarlen, G. (2000). What does it mean to say that logic is formal?.Dissertation Doctoral. University of Pittsburg . Disponible: https://johnmacfarlane.net/dissertation.pdf

Mancosu, P. (2008). The Philosophy of Mathematic Practice. Oxford University Press. New York.

Maloney, M. (2006). Constructivism: A realistic Approach Math. The University of Chicago. Disponible: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b7f9/b4be41bfb668395153cc0e5a3da22d49a70f.pdf

Parsons, C. (1990). The Structuralist view of Mathematic Objects. Synthese. Kluwer Academic Plubishers. Netherlands. Disponible: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00485186

Parsons, C. (2008). Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Cambridge University Press. Disponible: https://philpapers.org/rec/PARMTA-2

Restall, Greg. (2006). Logic. An Introduction. Routledge. London.

Rieger, A. (2008). Paradox , ZF, and the axiom of foundation. En Clark, P. and Hallett, M. and DeVidi, D. (Eds). Vintage Enthusiasm: Essays in honour of of J. L. Bell. University of Glasgow. Disponible: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5bd1/c8264bbee19da132a795b1faa9a9595bbacc.pdf

Rodin, A. (2012). Axomatic Method and Category Theory. Disponible: https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1478

Rodin, A. (2006). Toward Hermeneutic Categorical Mathematics. Ecole Normale Superieure. Disponible: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2894/1/Interpretation.pdf

Ruiz, A. (1990). Matemática y Filosofía. Estudios Logicistas .Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica.

Salgado, S. (2011). Bertrand Russell: Un viaje a los fundamentos de la verdad. Cuadernos de Filosofía Dureiras. Disponible: https://es.slideshare.net/WilliamAlfredoLudea/bertrand-russell-un-viaje-a-los-fundamentos-de-la-verdad

Sereni, A. y Panza, M. (2015). On the Indispensable Premises of the Indispensability Argument. En Lolli. G,. Panza, M., Venturi, G. (Eds) Logic and Practice Italian studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Springer. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278757640_On_the_Indispensable_Premises_of_the_Indispensability_Argument

Shapiro, S. (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematic and Logic Disponible: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.6584&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Strawson, P. (1975). Los límites del sentido. Ensayo sobre la Critica de la Razón Pura de Kant. Ediciones de la Revista de Occidente. Madrid.

Trobok, M. (2008). A Structuralist Account of Logic. Croatian Journal of Philosophy. Vol. VIII No.23. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255608702_A_Structuralist_Account_of_Logic

Von Bulow, C. (2009). Shapiro´s and Hellman´s Structuralism. Disponible:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255929155_Shapiro's_and_Hellman's_Structuralism

Publicado

2020-12-27

Cómo citar

Sánchez Rosal, A. A. (2020). La filosofía de la matemática y sus objetos matemáticos. Red De Investigación Educativa, 13(1), 43 - 55. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/redine/article/view/3035

Número

Sección

Artículos