Diversity of Hesperids (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in agroecosystems of Lara State, Venezuela
Keywords:
Biological indicators, dry tropical forest, jumping butterflies, mountain forestsAbstract
The hesperids or skippers are diurnal butterflies whose role of their species as indicators of the conservation level of ecosystems is recognized. With the objective of obtaining information on new records of these butterflies, field trips were made to several localities of Lara State, Venezuela, from 2013 to 2016. Adults were collected using insect nets, while immature stages were obtained manually together with parts of the associated plant. After collection, samples were taken to the Entomology Research Laboratory at Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado. Species diversity was estimated through the use of alpha and Beta indices. The faunal composition was also illustrated through Venn diagram. From the taxonomic review, it was possible to identify 236 specimens, which were grouped into 3 subfamilies, 11 genera and 7 species as follow. Hesperiinae: Hylephila phyleus (Drury, 1773), Perichares (Scudder, 1872), Panoquina Hemming, 1934 y Wallengrenia Berg, 1897. Pyrginae: Antigonus Hubner, 1819, Autochton zarex Hubner, 1818, Autochton Hubner, 1823, Chiodes castillus Cramer, 1779, Heliopetes macaira Reakirt, 1864, Pyrgus Hubner, 1819, Pyrgus orcus Stoll, 1780, Urbanus proteus (Linnaeus, 1758), U. dorantes (Stoll, 1790) y Pyrrhopyginae: Pyrrhopyge Hubner, 1819. The locality of Río Claro presented the highest alpha and Beta diversity value, followed by Tarabana and Carorita. The species with the highest number of individuals was U. proteus, which has been reported by other authors as a pest in legumes.Bosque seco tropical
Downloads
References
2. Andrade G. 1998. Utilización de las mariposas como bioindicadores del tipo de hábitat y su biodiversidad en Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 22(84): 407-421.
3. Bell E. 1946. A Catalogue of the Hesperioidea of Venezuela. Bol. Entomol. Venez. 5(3-4): 65-203.
4. Brown K. y A. Freitas. 2000. Atlantic forest butterflies: Indicator for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32: 934-956.
5. Comstock J. 1960. An Introduction to Entomology. Comstock Publishing Associates. New York. 1064 p.
6. Constantino L. 1997. Conocimiento de los ciclos de vida y plantas hospederas de lepidópteros diurnos de Colombia como estrategia para el manejo, uso y conservación de poblaciones silvestres. Memorias I Seminario Nacional de Aconteceres Entomológicos. Universidad Nacional, Medellín, Colombia. pp. 57-89.
7. DeVries P., T. Wallas y H. Greeney. 1999. Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimentions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorial rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 333-353.
8. DeVries P. y T. Wallas. 2001. Species diversity and community structure in Neotropical fruit feeding butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 1-15.
9. Giraldo C., M. Marín y S. Uribe. 2015. Mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) asociadas a una plantación citrícola del Canón del Río Cauca, Caldas- Colombia. Boletín Científico Centro de Museos de Historia Natural 19(2): 83-94.
10. González L. y M. Andrade. 2008. Diversidad y Biogeografía preliminar de mariposas saltarinas (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) de Colombia. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 32(124): 421 - 433.
11. Hernández C., I. Vargas, A. Martinez y J. Llorente. 2008. Distribución de las mariposas diurnas (Lepidóptera: Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea) del estado de México, México. Revista de Biología Tropical 56(3): 1309-1341.
12. Kremen C., R. Colwell, T. Erwin, D. Murphy, R. Noss y M. Sanjayan. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod Assemblages: Their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7(4): 796-808.
13. Lazzeri M., M. Bar y M. Pieri. 2011. Diversidad del orden Lepidóptera: (Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea) en la ciudad de Corrientes, Argentina. Revista de Biología Tropical 59(1): 299-308.
14. Moreno C. 2001. Métodos para medir la Biodiversidad. Manuales y Tesis. SEA. volumen 1. Zaragoza. 83 p.
15. Orellana A. 2008. Pyrrhopyginae de Venezuela (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae). Entomotrópica Vol. 23(3): 177-291.
16. Orozco S., S. Moriel y J. Palacios. 2009. Diversidad de lepidópteros diurnos en un área del bosque seco tropical del Occidente Antioqueño. Actualidades Biológicas 31(90): 31-41.
17. Salazar J. y J. Vélez. 1991. Mariposas de Colombia. Primera edición. Bogotá. Villegas Editores. 167 p.
18. Sánchez A., G. Soto, S. Brenes, R. Agüero y A. Retana. 2012. Listado de algunas familias de Lepidóptera asociadas a plantas arvenses del banano (Musa AAA) en el caribe de Costa Rica. Cultivos Tropicales 33(4): 16-20 ISSN 0258-5936
19. Soto G. y A. González. 1998. Estados larvales de Lepidóptera asociados con plantas de importancia económica en Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense 22(2): 229-233.
20. Warren A., J. Ogawa y A. Brower. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies and circumscription of tribes in the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea). Cladistics 24: 1-35.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Rights of the author/s are from the year of publication
This work is under the license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
The opinions expressed by the authors not necesarily reflect the position of the publisher or UCLA. The total or partial reproduction of the texts published in this journal is authorized, as long as the complete source and the electronic address of this journal is cited. Authors have the right to use their articles for any purpose as long as it is done for non-profit purposes. Authors can publish the final version of their work on internet or any other medium, after it has been published in this journal.
Bioagro reserves the right to make textual modifications and technical adjustments to the figures of the manuscripts, in accordance with the style and specifications of the journal.