Narrative review of cognitive skills. Conceptual transitions from Bloom to the digital age

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795214

Keywords:

cognitive skills, taxonomy, metacognition

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of the concept of cognitive skills from the influential Bloom's Taxonomy (1956) to contemporary perspectives in the digital age. In a context of pedagogical innovation and digital transformation, the research aims to identify the differential nuances between key theoretical models: Bloom, Anderson & Krathwohl, Marzano, and Churches. The narrative review of specialized literature examines the underlying assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses of each model. The thematic axes include the structure of cognitive skills, the emphasis on knowledge or processes, the integration of affective and motivational aspects, and the consideration of the digital context. The findings reveal a transition from a hierarchical and knowledge-centered approach to a more dynamic, integral, and contextualized approach. It is concluded that the field of cognitive skills is moving towards a paradigm that recognizes the complexity of the learning process, the importance of digital skills, and the competencies for the 21st century. This evolution has significant implications for pedagogical practice, curriculum design, and future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956a). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.

Bloom, BS (1956b). Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación: La clasificación de las metas educativas. Manuales I y II . Librería El Ateneo Editorial.

César Valdés, J. C. (2023). Dimensiones cognitivas de las competencias investigativas. Revista Digital De Investigación Y Postgrado, 4(8), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.59654/fvaq7b79

Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's taxonomy blooms digitally. Tech & Learning, 1, 1-6. https://teachnology.pbworks.com/f/Bloom%5C's+Taxonomy+Blooms+Digitally.pdf

Churches, A. (2010). The digital taxonomy: A framework for 21st-century learning. http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/26327358/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf

Clavero, F. H. (2001). Habilidades cognitivas. Notas del Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Granada, España. https://cursos.aiu.edu/Desarrollo%20de%20Habilidades%20del%20Pensamiento/PDF/Tema%203.pdf

Cooper, H. M. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (Vol. 2). Sage.

Cuenca, A., Álvarez, M., Ontaneda, L., Ontaneda, E., & Ontaneda, S. (2021). La Taxonomía de Bloom para la era digital: actividades digitales docentes en octavo, noveno y décimo grado de Educación General Básica (EGB) en la Habilidad de Comprender. Espacios, 42(11), 11-25. https://revistaespacios.com/a21v42n11/a21v42n11p02.pdf

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.

Ferrari, R. (2015). Redacción de revisiones bibliográficas en estilo narrativo. Medical Writing, 24 (4), 230-235.

Freré Arauz, J. S., Véliz Gavilanes, J. P., Sarco Alemán, E. M., & Campoverde Jimenez, K. J. (2022). La percepción, la cognición y la interactividad. RECIMUNDO, 6(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/6.(2).abr.2022.151-159

González, F. F. M. (2020). Mediación tecnológica orientada al desarrollo de habilidades cognitivas: Aportes para la sociedad del conocimiento. Revista EDUCARE-UPEL-IPB-Segunda Nueva Etapa 2.0, 24(2), 190-211.

Guirao Goris, S. J. A. (2015). Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene, 9(2), 0-0. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=s1988-348x2015000200002&script=sci_arttext

Marzano, R. J. (2007a). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007b). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Munzenmaier, C., & Rubin, N. (2013). Bloom’s Taxonomy: What’s Old Is New Again The eLearning Guild. publicservicesalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/guildresearch_blooms2013.pdf

Sánchez, M. (2002). La investigación sobre el desarrollo y la enseñanza de las habilidades de pensamiento. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa 4, (1).

Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., Dewandeleer, J., Xu, C., de Vries, N., Hens, E., & Baeyens, D. (2021). Strengthening executive function and self-regulation through teacher–student interaction in preschool and primary school: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 718262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718262

Siemens, G. (2005). Conectivismo: una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital. Revista Internacional de Tecnología Educativa y Educación a Distancia, 2(1).

Tacca Huamán, D. R. (2010). La enseñanza de las ciencias naturales en la educación básica. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/2327

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Arcia Hernández, P. F., & Sanhueza Mendoza, R. (2025). Narrative review of cognitive skills. Conceptual transitions from Bloom to the digital age. Revista Científica Compendium, 28(55), 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18795214

Issue

Section

Investigación